True Colors: Carolyn Kalil’s Personality Assessment

Calm, happy, complex, practical, spontaneous these atomic number 18 a few ways to describe aces temper. Everyone has several(prenominal) different pieces to their personality, almost as a puzzle has many pieces that rag up one big picture. Throughout time many idiosyncratics concur come up with their own regularitys to analyze ones personality. This endeavor volition describe my understanding of Carolyn Kalils True colourise personality sagacity and present evidence to support its accuracy. Kalils personality assessment has four possible outcomes. After pickings the assessment one will be given a alter blue, green, gold, or orangeness.Each color resembles a different personality type. Some examples are calm, curious, organized, and active, respectively. After taking this assessment I found out that my personality is blue, which fits me. I take calm, harmonious relationships, working in groups, helping and nurturing others, along with well though decision making. The as sessment asks a series of would you rather style questions. bingle of the questions, for example, is When in a relationship I (a) prefer my partner to cope that I have it away them without telling them, (b) tell my partner that I love them. After the assessment your results are generated with some information about your color. For outdo results, one must be truthful when answering the questions. Some state lack personality moral principle, which is when one pretends to be likeable rather than demonstrate their true colors (Lamberton, Minor&, 2010). Lacking personality ethic may give false results, much(prenominal) as how you want to be rather than how you really are. I was a little shocked at the accuracy of the results. This pushed me to dig deeper to find more information on Kalils strategy.Carolyn Kalils study used analysis and interpretation, a common method in creating and evaluation surveys. She gathered her information and then assigned marrow to it which helped h er to determine conclusions and give her findings significance. Her independent variables were the personality types listed above. Her depended variables were 1) Feeling, Thinking, Judging, and Perceiving from the MBTI, 2) the General Occupational Themes of Social, Investigative, Conventional, and existent from the SII, and 3) the Orientation Scales of Helping, Analyzing, Organizing, Producing, and Adventuring dimensions of the CISS. (Kalil, 1998). Instrumentation Carolyn Kalil used two instruments when developing her True Colors personality assessment. These instruments were character cards and words clusters. The character cards consisted of an individual wandering four cards, each of which represents one of the four personality types (Krathwohl, 1998). This analyze appeals more to the blue and gold personalities. The word clusters required the individual to rank a list of adjectives one a scale of 1 to 4 with 4 macrocosm most like the individual and 1 being least like them ( Krathwohl, 1998).Obviously, this test was self-scored. This test appeals more to the green and orange personalities. Result Kalil operated on the principal of convergent validity. This means that her assessments are relate to what they should, in theory, be related to (Lowry, 1990). An example of this would be similarities among test scores. This is because one assumes if youre taking a test then you should have real knowledge for that subject, resulting in a high test score.Although the subjects for both instruments were staminate and female, no gender differences were found in Kalils studies, (other personality assessments such as the Strong Interest Inventory or the Campbell Interest accomplishment and Survey did, however, show strong differences between genders) concluding that gender does not affect personality types (Lowry, 1990). Kalil found that personality types do change everyplace time and may be influenced by outside factors such as the environment in which they are testing or their current supposition (Kalil, 1998).