Internet Censorship Means No Freedom of Speech -- Argumentative Persua

Picture it you pick up your phone to read your email. Youre expecting a heart and soul from a friend, who is sending you some information on boob cancer, but when you check your inbox there is instead a message from the server. It says the message that was sent to you from the address of your friend has been intercepted because it contained indecent material that did not keep up with FCC regulations of the Internet. You call your friend yet to find that the police have go in and taken her away, and she is now facing up to two years in prison and/or up to $100,000 in fines. The message sent by your friend contained the word breast, which by current FCC permitards is indecent, and thus not permitted to be transferred on the Internet. Due to this, your friend is now subject to criminal charges. clayey ridiculous? Unreasonable? Perhaps even a bit shuddery? It is all three of these things, but further, it is impending reality. This situation is very possible, in the very near f uture. On February 8, 1996, President Clinton signed the Exon Bill, let out of the Communications Decency Act a bill which makes the possibility of this situation a frightening reality. This bill will allow the giving medication to censor the Internet, by whatsoever means it deems necessary. Under the CDA the seven dirty words, as well as anything the government considers sexually explicit or indecent, will be banned from the Internet. The CDA, however, will not be enforceable until all appeals made against it by organizations such as the Citizens Internet authorisation Coalition (CIEC), and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), are resolved. The Internet is a worldwide medium for communication and the transfer of information. It is also, theoretica... ...Internet. They also succeeded in doing this without government interference, or threatening our rights as Americans. Further, it does this in a way which keeps parents touch on in their childs activities, and pres erves the parental right to decide what their child is expose to. It also ensures that the growth of the Internet is not stunted in any way. If people are educated on this issue, then they will be aware of what is occurring in this conflict, so they will be ready to stand up for their rights. Anyone who is informed on the subject will not need to risk losing their rights or freedom. Further, if there are solutions which will protect children on the Internet that at the same time protect our freedom of reference and the growth of the Internet and all its information, thus appeasing both sides, it is only logical and reasonable that we follow them.