Modern Society Mass Media Is Everywhere Media Essay

Modern Society Mass Media Is Everywhere Media EssayMass media has tercet major effects on our society. First, it t apiecees us the signifiers of the culture secondly, it puts issues into the agenda thirdly, it offers solutions to double star oppositions and teaches us what behaviors behaviours be preferred or at least sure within the dominant ideology.Thus set and behaviour of y unwraphs atomic number 18 powerfully influenced by the stilt media standardised newspapers, television system, radio, video, and the Internet. Mass media is categorised into three groups, the mug media (newspaper, journals, etc.), electronic media (television, radio) and the new-age media (the Internet, mobile phones, and computers). (Uttara, 2000) 5 In this essay, I will focus especially on free-to-air television syllabus and the web, how they ar non the main endeavours of properlyeous decline in juvenilitys today.First, exposure to frenzy images through television political program does not cause violence in younkers however decrease the prospect of being aggressive. However, we frequently see public pushing blames towards the television programmes. icon to aggressive stimuli will mendr physiological and emotional arousal, which will increase the probability of violence. (Dr. Mark, n.d.) 3 Thus it is frequently said that television is a practiced candidate for the cause of the increase in violence in the society. But, on the other hand, an online document, disagrees that exposure to violence images cause violence in youths and pointed out two theories Reinforcement theory and Aggressive Cues theory. The Reinforcement theory explains that whether youths strain towards aggressive will depend on the background of the youth. If a youth is brought up in a nasty environment, then the youth is qualifying to read violence images as real violence. The Aggressive Cues theory move on point out that whether the youths describe negatively influenced, all depends on how the media presents these images if the violence is presented in a justifiable way, then youths can be caterpillar track to combative behaviour and vice versa. (Mass Media and Society, n.d.)7 However, the television programmes shown on television pose violence in an appropriate way. Take Point of Entry as an example it portrays violence as a negative form for paradox solving. William Triplett (2007). 9 agreed that exposure to violence does not cause good declination in youths, All babies are born with violent tendencies, which most kids learn to promise as they grow of age(predicate)er. Thus exposure to violence scenes is not prudent for the moral decay in youths but depends on the way the youth is being brought up, where kindles and guardians come into place.Secondly, with respect to how some(prenominal) television and the net not cause moral decay in youths. Easy accessibility to versed images does not necessarily cause youths to be sexually arouse. However, throug h the internet, we often see sources stating society is degenerating because of the ready accessibility in pornography. (Dr. Mark, n.d.) 3 It is said that aboriginal exposure to pornography through the web causes youth early maturity, thusly an increase in number of sexual activities at an earlier age. why some(prenominal) the web and television does not cause decay in youths moral is because firstly, the reinforcement theory, a theory that implicates that whether a youth gets negatively or demonstrablely influenced depends on the youths background. Children who are sexually abused are going to read sexual signifiers differently than children whose parents demonstrate a loving, warmth relationship and explain sexual behaviors behaviours to their children. (Dr. Mark, n.d.) 3 Thus the core that had been brought over to youths depends all on how the youth interpret it. Besides, having early exposure to sexual images not only prepare the youths with the basic knowledge of sex but alike avoid impropriate action do on youths without them knowing that it is wrong. Therefore I conclude that two the web and television does not cause moral decay in youths but actually educates them and prepare them for the future.Thirdly, how television programme and web not cause moral decay in youths, like stuffism. Materialism in youths is not caused by the advertisements from both the free-to-air programmes and the net. Through the web, often see people pointing fingers towards the television programmes and the Internet example, Richins Dawson (1992). 6 pointed out that People view material possessions as a symbol of success and the source of happiness in life. 1 Thus it is said that advertisements motivate consumers to spend unnecessarily ca utilise youths to be materialistic. However, it is neither the television nor the Internet that causes philistinism in youths. It is due to both peer pressure and self-esteem. M either youths feel insecure with their look and posi tion because they feel that they are not fashionable or look good enough as compared to their friends and thus need to depend on accessories to get acknowledged by peers and to feel secure. Deborah Roedder John, and co-author Lan Nguyen Chaplin, (Materialism in Kids and Adolescents united to Self Esteem, n.d.) 8 have done two experiments with children and found out that the take aim of materialism is directly proportional to their self-esteem and this proper pride comes from among the peers. In the first experiment, they found that materialism rate increases from the age of 12 fore but after which declines by the age of 16 to18 years oldish and this mirrors a patterns in the youths sense of pride. They continued with their second experiment to concomitant materialism is not caused by the television and web. In the second experiment, positive feedbacks were given to the targeted youths from their peers positive remarks about them, and after which, result shows that the level of materialism decreases simultaneously. Thus it is the peers around who are responsible for the increase in level of materialism and not the television programme or the net.Fourth, with respect to the misunderstanding, that both television and the Internet cause moral decay in youths. Parents and guardians are responsible for the moral decay in youths. A research had been done from the United States 43 % of teens in the US have used drugs and inebriant at least once. Around 1 million teens have left wing their homes and half of them live as delinquent (naughty) boys and girls and the other half are drug users. About 2,000 teens from the age of 10 to 19 years old commit to suicide each year. Most of them come from wealthy families that are not harmonious. (Maxi, 2007) 4 From this result, it shows that family without parents or guardians love, care and concern will cause them to obtain ignorant. Without parents or guardians watch over, teens will be able to access any type of media capacitance, and cause youths to get negatively influenced by the restricted sites or aggressive programmes. Thus parents should be responsible as they have the right and should watch over the programmes selected by the youths prevent them from watching unconnected videos and see restricted sites. Besides watching over the programmes selected, parents should also communicate more(prenominal) than with their child and understands their need and enlighten them to avoid misinterpretation over the content from the programmes viewed. Thus, I conclude that parents and guardians are responsible for the cause moral decay in youths. With the appropriate guidance from young, youths will not misunderstand the message brought over to them from the images watched.Lastly why television and the Internet not cause moral decay is because both online resource and the television programmes provide youths with knowledgeal knowledge. In the past, most teachers conduct their lessons using either ve rbal discourse or at most with additional notes. Although teachers are still using this method to teach in the class today, students are learning facts and value from the mass media especially through the net and television programs. (Bukhari, 2006, p.111) 1 In school, the magazine slot given to moral education is limited, foremost two hours each week, thus youths cannot learn much morals in school. In fact, with more time given for moral lessons do no help improve the morals in youths. According to Cheung (n.d.). 2 Teachers find it difficult to teach values and attitudes while pupils find moral lessons boring. and state that TV Television has become childs third parent and a first teacher Exposed to media messages, pupils may be imperceptibly but strongly influenced by the values behind such media message. (p.62) Between moral education in class and through virtual images, the web resources enhance youths fill in learning more. This technological escalation has bestowed upon edu cation proliferation of equipment and materials which can assist in the reorganization and redefinition of educational experiences. (Bukhari, 2006, p.111) 1 Therefore I conclude that both the television programme and the Internet does not cause moral decay in youths but on the other hand teach them morals.In conclusion, both the Internet and free-to-air programmes plays an important role in shaping youths culture but not the main cause of moral decay in youths. The mass media is an amoral system the existence of inappropriate media content is because of the supporting subscribers that sustains its survival. The medias responsibility is to guide happiness and satisfaction to the receivers. With the precise preference, youths will not get negatively affected by both the net and television. Moreover, if youths got in contact with these inappropriate shows, parents should explain the correct message behind the scene to avoid misapprehend of content. Both the Internet and television pro grammes provide educational visuals. Therefore I conclude that both the Internet and television are not the main cause of moral decay in youths.