Death of a Salesman Comparisson

demise of a Salesman later reading and watching Arthur Millers Death of a Salesman, it was ready that there were many similarities and differences between the film and the text. Many of the actors chosen for roles in the depiction seemed to have fit Millers portrayal of the characters. among Willy feeling disturbed and lost to Lindas vivid concern for Willy they all were presented real well. However, in the play, Willy Loman is portrayed as a man of considerable size part in the film he is much smaller.Although Dustin Hoffman depicts the character of Willy Loman well, he gets so enthralled in the heat of the scene that it some times makes the audience inquire if Miller intended for Willy to be so dramatic and emotional. At times its overwhelming and even difficult to visit what Hoffman is saying. A problem with converting plays or books to motion picture is one cant see pictures that go along with text. The beware must create its own pictures of what is universe described .The portrayal of Linda Loman on entomb was completely different than what I had imagined her to be as while I was reading. I envisioned her to be a little younger and a lot to a greater extent(prenominal) run-down and tired from dealing with not sole(prenominal) Willy and his lost life but to her two sons and the social issues they have as well. I power saw her to be more distressed. As far as plot goes, the storyline was almost exactly the same in the movie and the play. Some scenes were interchanged, but not so much as to knap the development or structure of the story.It also looks as though the conductor of the film purposely made it appear homogeneous the movie was victorious place on a stage, probably to stay true to the circumstance that above all, Death of a Salesman is a play. I felt like the flashbacks were complete and in the film it visually helped the audience to understand what was red ink on. In the text on the other hand, it was up to the reader to understand when they happened and who all were part of them. I think the movie adaption of this was done very(prenominal) well showing how Ben wasnt really there and it was just Willys imagination when it came time for a flashback.The writers of the film script did a very good job with keeping specific lines clear and understandable, keeping in mind that they had to most likely change small things here and there. overall I found most of the movie compared to the play a success. Between choosing actors who fit their parts as though they actually were Willy Loman, Biff Loman, Bernard and so forth, to being spot on with the plot for the most part they were both(prenominal) very similar. Some failures in my opinion existed in the movie when analyse to the text as well.Read also Realism and Expressionism in Death of a SalesmanWhen reading the play I didnt see Willy and Linda being so touchy feely, as in the kissing and hugging that went on. withal the woman that Willy cheats on Linda with is much younger than I imagined. She is much more annoying especially with her laughing than as I saw her to be in the play itself. Lastly, toward the end, Biff seemed in my eyes much more emotional than I saw him to be through the text. I saw more anger and distress instead of caring about willy and strident that happened in the movie. Overall, yes there were successes and failures when comparing the film to the actual play, but I must say both were quite similar.